Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4118
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSam, F. E.-
dc.contributor.authorMa, T.-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorQiang, W.-
dc.contributor.authorAtuna, R. A.-
dc.contributor.authorAmagloh, F. K.-
dc.contributor.authorMorata, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHan, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T12:41:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-22T12:41:22Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2077-0375-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4118-
dc.description.abstractOver the last few years, the dealcoholization of wine has piqued the interest of winemakers and researchers. Physical dealcoholization methods are increasingly used in the dealcoholization of wines because they can partially or completely reduce the alcohol content of wines. This study aimed to compare the chemical parameters, volatile composition and sensory quality of white, rosé and red wines dealcoholized by two physical dealcoholization methods: reverse osmosis (RO) and vacuum distillation (VD) at 0.7% v/v ethanol. RO and VD effectively reduced the ethanol concentration in all wines to the required 0.7% v/v, but also significantly affected most chemical parameters. The pH, free sulfur dioxide, total sulfur dioxide, and volatile acidity decreased significantly due to dealcoholization by RO and VD, while reducing sugars and total acidity increased significantly. VD resulted in higher color intensity, which was perceptible in dealcoholized rosé and red wines, while RO caused notable color differences in dealcoholized white and red wine fractions. RO were richer in esters (more ethyl esters and isoamyl acetate), higher alcohols, organic acids, terpenics and C13-norisoprenoids, and carbonyl compounds, while wines dealcoholized with VD had lower levels of these volatile compounds, which may reflect both the loss of esters into the distillate during evaporation and condensation (in the case of VD) and a shift in the chemical equilibrium responsible for ester formation and hydrolysis after ethanol removal. β-damascenone exhibited the highest OAV in all wines, however, losses equal to 35.54–61.98% in RO dealcoholized fractions and 93.62% to 97.39% in VD dealcoholized fractions were observed compared to the control wines. The predominant aroma series in the original and dealcoholized wines were fruity and floral but were greatly affected by VD. Sensory evaluation and PCA showed that dealcoholization by RO improved the fruity and floral notes (in rosé and red wines), color intensity, sweetness, viscosity, and aroma intensity better than dealcoholization by VD, while VD mainly enhanced the color of the dealcoholized wines. Both methods increased the acidity of the respective dealcoholized wines. Nevertheless, RO dealcoholized wines achieved higher acceptance by the panelists than VD dealcoholized wines. Therefore, RO may be a better method for producing dealcoholized (0.7% v/v) wines with minimal impact on aroma and sensory quality.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.11;Issue 12-
dc.subjectAlcohol-Free Wineen_US
dc.subjectChemical Parametersen_US
dc.subjectDealcoholizationen_US
dc.subjectMembraneen_US
dc.subjectNon-Alcoholic Wine Reverse Osmosisen_US
dc.subjectSensory Characteristicsen_US
dc.subjectVacuum Distillationen_US
dc.subjectVolatile Compoundsen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON BETWEEN MEMBRANE AND THERMAL DEALCOHOLIZATION METHODS: THEIR IMPACT ON THE CHEMICAL PARAMETERS, VOLATILE COMPOSITION, AND SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS OF WINESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Sciences



Items in UDSspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.