Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4318
Title: | MEASUREMENT OF PREGNANCY-RELATED ANXIETY WORLDWIDE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW |
Authors: | Hadfield, K. Akyirem, S. Sartori, L. Abdul-Latif, A. M. Akaateba, D. Bayrampour, H. Daly, A. Hadfield, K. Abiiro, G. A. |
Keywords: | Pregnancy-related anxiety Pregnancy Maternal mental health Systematic review Measurement Crosscultural Reliability and validity Background |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Publisher: | BMC pregnancy and childbirth |
Series/Report no.: | Vol. 22;Issue 1 |
Abstract: | Background: The perinatal period is often characterized by specific fear, worry, and anxiety concerning the pregnancy and its outcomes, referred to as pregnancy-related anxiety. Pregnancy-related anxiety is uniquely associated with negative maternal and child health outcomes during pregnancy, at birth, and early childhood; as such, it is increasingly studied. We examined how pregnancy-related anxiety is measured, where measures were developed and validated, and where pregnancy-related anxiety has been assessed. We will use these factors to identify potential issues in measurement of pregnancy-related anxiety and the geographic gaps in this area of research. Methods: We searched the Africa-Wide, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO Citation Index, and ERIC databases for studies published at any point up to 01 August 2020 that assessed pregnancy-related anxiety. Search terms included pregnancy-related anxiety, pregnancy-related worry, prenatal anxiety, anxiety during pregnancy, and pregnancy-specific anxiety, among others. Inclusion criteria included: empirical research, published in English, and the inclusion of any assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety in a sample of pregnant women. This review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020189938). Results: The search identified 2904 records; after screening, we retained 352 full-text articles for consideration, ultimately including 269 studies in the review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 39 measures of pregnancy-related anxiety were used in these 269 papers, with 18 used in two or more studies. Less than 20% of the included studies (n = 44) reported research conducted in low- and middle-income country contexts. With one exception, all measures of pregnancy-related anxiety used in more than one study were developed in high-income country contexts. Only 13.8% validated the measures for use with a low- or middle-income country population. Conclusions: Together, these results suggest that pregnancy-related anxiety is being assessed frequently among pregnant people and in many countries, but often using tools that were developed in a context dissimilar to the participants’ context and which have not been validated for the target population. Culturally relevant measures of pregnancy-related anxiety which are developed and validated in low-income countries are urgently needed |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4318 |
ISSN: | 14712393 |
Appears in Collections: | Institute for Interdisciplinary Research and Consultancy Services (IIRaCS) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MEASUREMENT OF PREGNANCY-RELATED ANXIETY WORLDWIDE A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.pdf | 1.38 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.