Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4318
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHadfield, K.-
dc.contributor.authorAkyirem, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSartori, L.-
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Latif, A. M.-
dc.contributor.authorAkaateba, D.-
dc.contributor.authorBayrampour, H.-
dc.contributor.authorDaly, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHadfield, K.-
dc.contributor.authorAbiiro, G. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T15:11:33Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-30T15:11:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn14712393-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4318-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The perinatal period is often characterized by specific fear, worry, and anxiety concerning the pregnancy and its outcomes, referred to as pregnancy-related anxiety. Pregnancy-related anxiety is uniquely associated with negative maternal and child health outcomes during pregnancy, at birth, and early childhood; as such, it is increasingly studied. We examined how pregnancy-related anxiety is measured, where measures were developed and validated, and where pregnancy-related anxiety has been assessed. We will use these factors to identify potential issues in measurement of pregnancy-related anxiety and the geographic gaps in this area of research. Methods: We searched the Africa-Wide, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO Citation Index, and ERIC databases for studies published at any point up to 01 August 2020 that assessed pregnancy-related anxiety. Search terms included pregnancy-related anxiety, pregnancy-related worry, prenatal anxiety, anxiety during pregnancy, and pregnancy-specific anxiety, among others. Inclusion criteria included: empirical research, published in English, and the inclusion of any assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety in a sample of pregnant women. This review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020189938). Results: The search identified 2904 records; after screening, we retained 352 full-text articles for consideration, ultimately including 269 studies in the review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 39 measures of pregnancy-related anxiety were used in these 269 papers, with 18 used in two or more studies. Less than 20% of the included studies (n = 44) reported research conducted in low- and middle-income country contexts. With one exception, all measures of pregnancy-related anxiety used in more than one study were developed in high-income country contexts. Only 13.8% validated the measures for use with a low- or middle-income country population. Conclusions: Together, these results suggest that pregnancy-related anxiety is being assessed frequently among pregnant people and in many countries, but often using tools that were developed in a context dissimilar to the participants’ context and which have not been validated for the target population. Culturally relevant measures of pregnancy-related anxiety which are developed and validated in low-income countries are urgently neededen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC pregnancy and childbirthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 22;Issue 1-
dc.subjectPregnancy-related anxietyen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectMaternal mental healthen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.subjectCrossculturalen_US
dc.subjectReliability and validityen_US
dc.subjectBackgrounden_US
dc.titleMEASUREMENT OF PREGNANCY-RELATED ANXIETY WORLDWIDE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEWen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Institute for Interdisciplinary Research and Consultancy Services (IIRaCS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MEASUREMENT OF PREGNANCY-RELATED ANXIETY WORLDWIDE A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.