Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1275| Title: | A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE UTILITY OF 1.5 VERSUS 3 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE BRAIN IMAGING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE AND RESEARCH |
| Authors: | Wardlaw, J. M. Brindle, W. Casado, A. M. Shuler, K. Henderson, M. Thomas, B. Macfarlane, J. Maniega, S. A. Lymer, K. Morris, Z. Pernet, C. Nailon, W. Ahearn, T. Mumuni, A. N. Mugruza, C. McLean, J. Chakirova, G. Tao, Y. T Simpson, J. Stanfield, A. C. Johnston, H. Parikh, J. Royle, N.A. Wilde, J. D. Bastin, M. E. Weir, N. Farrall, A. Maria, c. Hernandez, v. |
| Keywords: | Magneticresonanceimaging Sensitivityand specificity Brain Neuroimaging Systematicreview |
| Issue Date: | 2012 |
| Publisher: | European Society of Radiology |
| Abstract: | Objective MRI at 3 T is said to be more accurate than 1.5 T MR, but costs and other practical differences mean that it is unclear which to use. Methods We systematically reviewed studies comparing diagnostic accuracy at 3 T with 1.5 T. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources from 1 January 2000 to 22 October 2010 for studies comparing diagnostic accuracy |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1275 |
| Appears in Collections: | School of Allied Health Sciences |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE UTILITY OF 1.5 VERSUS 3 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE BRAIN IMAGING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE AND RESEARCH.pdf | 202.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.