1. UDSspace
  2. Research Articles
  3. School of Allied Health Sciences
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1275
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWardlaw, J. M.-
dc.contributor.authorBrindle, W.-
dc.contributor.authorCasado, A. M.-
dc.contributor.authorShuler, K.-
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, M.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, B.-
dc.contributor.authorMacfarlane, J.-
dc.contributor.authorManiega, S. A.-
dc.contributor.authorLymer, K.-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorPernet, C.-
dc.contributor.authorNailon, W.-
dc.contributor.authorAhearn, T.-
dc.contributor.authorMumuni, A. N.-
dc.contributor.authorMugruza, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, J.-
dc.contributor.authorChakirova, G.-
dc.contributor.authorTao, Y. T-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, J.-
dc.contributor.authorStanfield, A. C.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, H.-
dc.contributor.authorParikh, J.-
dc.contributor.authorRoyle, N.A.-
dc.contributor.authorWilde, J. D.-
dc.contributor.authorBastin, M. E.-
dc.contributor.authorWeir, N.-
dc.contributor.authorFarrall, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMaria, c.-
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, v.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T09:59:29Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T09:59:29Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1275-
dc.description.abstractObjective MRI at 3 T is said to be more accurate than 1.5 T MR, but costs and other practical differences mean that it is unclear which to use. Methods We systematically reviewed studies comparing diagnostic accuracy at 3 T with 1.5 T. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources from 1 January 2000 to 22 October 2010 for studies comparing diagnostic accuracyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Society of Radiologyen_US
dc.subjectMagneticresonanceimagingen_US
dc.subjectSensitivityand specificityen_US
dc.subjectBrainen_US
dc.subjectNeuroimagingen_US
dc.subjectSystematicreviewen_US
dc.titleA SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE UTILITY OF 1.5 VERSUS 3 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE BRAIN IMAGING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE AND RESEARCHen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Allied Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE UTILITY OF 1.5 VERSUS 3 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE BRAIN IMAGING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE AND RESEARCH.pdf202.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.