Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmeade, E. P. K.-
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, B. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T15:19:40Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T15:19:40Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2474-1353-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1282-
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Management of pain is optimized if the pain is assessed with the appropriate measuring tool. Verbal rating scale (VRS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) are pain assessment tools. This study was aimed at determining if there is an agreement between VRS and NRS in menstrual pain assessment and the cutoff point of VRS categories on the NRS. Methods: A semi-structure questionnaire was used to collect data from a cross sectional study involving 236 female undergraduate students of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences of the University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana. GraphPad Prism 5.01 and SPSS 21 statistical tools were used to analyze the data in this study. From a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the cut-off points of VRS categories on NRS were determined. Results: There was a positive, strong and significant correlation between the NRS - 10 and the VRS - 3 pain assessment instruments (Spearman’s rho = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76 - 0.85; p-value < 0.0001). Agreement between VRS and NRS (kappa = 0.69) was good. The cut-off points for the VRS pain intensity categories of mild, moderate and severe on the NRS were 1 to 3, 4 to 6 and 7 to 10 respectively. Socio-demographic characteristics had no influence on the ability to place VRS category within the cut-off point ranges on the NRS except course of study with medical students scoring best (95.2% vrs 66.7 - 82.1%; χ2 = 10.1; df = 4; p value = 0.0387). Area under ROC curve scores were close to 1 (0.871, 0.9833, 0.9935; p < 0.0001) which showed that VRS and NRS exhibited a significant discriminatory capability in menstrual pain assessment. Conclusion: High correlation and discriminatory capability exist between VRS and NRS as tools for the measurement of menstrual pain. A kappa coefficient of 0.69 shows that the agreement between VRS and NRS is good hence both can be used for pain measurement. The cut-off points for the VRS pain intensity categories of mild, moderate and severe on the NRS were 1 to 3, 4 to 6 and 7 to 10 respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherClinmed internatioal libraryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 2;Issue 2-
dc.subjectDysmenorrheaen_US
dc.subjectMenstrual painen_US
dc.subjectCut-off pointen_US
dc.subjectVerbal rating scaleen_US
dc.subjectNumerical rating scaleen_US
dc.titleMENSTRUAL PAIN ASSESSMENT: COMPARING VERBAL RATING SCALE (VRS) WITH NUMERICAL RATING SCALES (NRS) AS PAIN MEASUREMENT TOOLSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine and Health Sciences



Items in UDSspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.