Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/769
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMillar, D.-
dc.contributor.authorDittoh, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-27T12:06:17Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-27T12:06:17Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.issn0855 – 6768-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/769-
dc.description.abstractIn this article, with reference to Ghana and Zimbabwe, we explore the traditional African worldview, fife-world, belief systems and wtrys of thinking and reasoning. This discourse captures the rich combination of spirituality, materiality and the social in a concept referred to here as Cosmovision. Nowadays this worldview co-exists with western worldviews and systems of thinking, in various shades and combinations of both, as several parallels within the same continuum. In the article, we try to illustrate that in the traditional African knowledge systems often a hierarchy exists between divine beings, spiritual beings, ancestors, and natural forces, such as climate, disease, floods, soil, vegetation, and animals. The worldview suggests a cyclical notion of time, and gives rise to several rituals in which the elders and spiritual leaders play a prominent role. From the exampies "ofGhana and Zimbabwe in this write-up, it becomes clear that in the traditional worldview, land, water, animals and plants are not just a production factor with economic significance. They have their place within the sacred or spiritual realm. The role of colonialism in the subordination of African science and knowledge systems in general is discussed. The article argues that the Transfer-Of- Technology model assumed even after independence still subjugated the African knowledge system and continues to do so. This notwithstanding, African knowledge systems persist albeit marginally, and has sustained many lives this far. The article ends with a series of conclusions that highlight the reawakening of interest in African knowledge systems.' This new interest is due in part to the persistence of elements of African knowledge systems despite the numerous interruptions by interventionists. The failure of interventions from the western world to provide the envisaged benefits has gone to buttress the need for an alternative to the dominant paradigm approach. With these concluding remarks the article then makes a recommendation for an endogenous development process that focuses on a blend between the two knowledge systems within the concept of endogenous development.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity for Development Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 1;Issue 2-
dc.subjectCosmovisionen_US
dc.subjectEndogenousen_US
dc.subjectWorldviewen_US
dc.subjectTraditionalen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectSystemen_US
dc.titleINTERFACING TWO KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS: LOCAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE IN AFRICAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Ghana Journal of Development Studies (GJDS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
INTERFACING TWO KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LOCAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE IN AFRICA.pdf7.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.