Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/381
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbiiro, G.A.-
dc.contributor.authorDe Allegri, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-04T13:28:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-04T13:28:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1472-698X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/381-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is an emerging global consensus on the importance of universal health coverage (UHC), but no unanimity on the conceptual definition and scope of UHC, whether UHC is achievable or not, how to move towards it, common indicators for measuring its progress, and its long-term sustainability. This has resulted in various interpretations of the concept, emanating from different disciplinary perspectives. This paper discusses the various dimensions of UHC emerging from these interpretations and argues for the need to pay attention to the complex interactions across the various components of a health system in the pursuit of UHC as a legal human rights issue. Discussion: The literature presents UHC as a multi-dimensional concept, operationalized in terms of universal population coverage, universal financial protection, and universal access to quality health care, anchored on the basis of health care as an international legal obligation grounded in international human rights laws. As a legal concept, UHC implies the existence of a legal framework that mandates national governments to provide health care to all residents while compelling the international community to support poor nations in implementing this right. As a humanitarian social concept, UHC aims at achieving universal population coverage by enrolling all residents into health-related social security systems and securing equitable entitlements to the benefits from the health system for all. As a health economics concept, UHC guarantees financial protection by providing a shield against the catastrophic and impoverishing consequences of out-of-pocket expenditure, through the implementation of pooled prepaid financing systems. As a public health concept, UHC has attracted several controversies regarding which services should be covered: comprehensive services vs. minimum basic package, and priority disease-specific interventions vs. primary health care. Summary: As a multi-dimensional concept, grounded in international human rights laws, the move towards UHC in LMICs requires all states to effectively recognize the right to health in their national constitutions. It also requires a human rights-focused integrated approach to health service delivery that recognizes the health system as a complex phenomenon with interlinked functional units whose effective interaction are essential to reach the equilibrium called UHC.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC International Health and Human Rightsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 15;Issue 17-
dc.subjectUniversal health coverageen_US
dc.subjectMulti-dimensional concepten_US
dc.subjectRights-baseden_US
dc.subjectPopulation coverageen_US
dc.subjectFinancial protectionen_US
dc.subjectAccess to health servicesen_US
dc.subjectHealth systemen_US
dc.subjectConceptual literatureen_US
dc.subjectGlobal debatesen_US
dc.titleUNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE FROM MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES: A SYNTHESIS OF CONCEPTUAL LITERATURE AND GLOBAL DEBATESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Planning and Land Mangement



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.