Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3780
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdzitey, F.-
dc.contributor.authorAweligiya, G.-
dc.contributor.authorEkli, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T09:59:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-12T09:59:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1994-5426-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3780-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: African swine fever is a highly contagious viral disease that affects domestic pigs and it is characterized by fever, blotching of skin, hemorrhage of the lymph nodes, internal organs and the gastrointestinal tract. Management of viral diseases require the immune system of the organism and the use of antibiotics to control secondary infections. This study determined the antibiotic susceptibility of fastidious and non-fastidious bacteria isolated from pigs infected with African swine fever to standard antibiotics and ʻLuwineʼ (a local herbal medicine prepared from the root of Sarcocephalus latifolius and dry bark peels of Pseudocedrela kotschyi used by farmers to control Africa swine fever in Navrongo, Ghana. Materials and Methods: The disc diffusion method was used for the antibiotic susceptibility test. The non-fastidious and fastidious bacteria were tested against 8 antibiotics and ʻLuwineʼ. Results: The non-fastidious and fastidious bacteria were all resistant to ʻLuwineʼ. The non-fastidious bacteria were highly susceptible to azithromycin (100%), gentamicin (100%) and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (80%) but resistant to teicoplanin (70%). The fastidious bacteria were highly susceptible to gentamicin (70%) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (70%) but resistant to ceftriaxone (100%), teicoplanin (100%) and chloramphenicol (80%). Intermediate resistant occurred for all the antibiotics except azithromycin and gentamicin for non-fastidious bacteria. Intermediate resistant also occurred for all the antibiotics except ceftriaxone and teicoplanin for fastidious bacteria. Multidrug resistant occurred between the non-fastidious (50%) and fastidious (90%) bacteria. The non-fastidious bacteria exhibited 8 different antibiotic resistant patterns. The fastidious bacteria exhibited 10 different antibiotic resistant patterns. Multiple antibiotic index (MAR) ranged from 0.13-0.50 and 0.25-0.75 for non-fastidious and fastidious bacteria, respectively. Conclusion: The non-fastidious bacteria were generally more resistant than the fastidious bacteria. ʻLuwineʼ was not effective against the bacteria associated with African swine fever infection. Among the antibiotics, gentamicin was the best for controlling bacteria associated with African swine fever pigsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsian Network for Scientific Informationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.12;Issue 1-
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistanceen_US
dc.subjectherbal medicineen_US
dc.subjectmicroorganismsen_US
dc.subjectswine diseasesen_US
dc.subjectnon-fastidiousen_US
dc.subjectAfrican swine feveren_US
dc.titleANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF FASTIDIOUS AND NON-FASTIDIOUS BACTERIA FROM AFRICAN SWINE FEVER PIGS TO STANDARD ANTIBIOTICS AND ‘LUWINE’en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Sciences



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.